by Mike Masnick
Thu, Mar 19th 2009 6:33pm
What is it with newspapers suing each other these days, rather than actually focusing on adding value? Eric Goldman alerts us to the news that the Scranton Times sued the competing Wilkes-Barre newspaper over "copied" obituaries. There are numerous problems with the lawsuit, not the least of which is that funeral homes often write the obituaries themselves (meaning the newspaper might not have any copyright claim to them in the first place) and distribute them to multiple papers (meaning they probably weren't even copied directly, but came from the same third party source). Luckily, the court has thrown out most (though not all) of the charges, including another attempt to revive the troubling "hot new" concept. It's good to see the court shoot that particular argument down quickly. In the meantime, Scranton Times: seriously? Is there really nothing better to be doing with your time and money than suing another paper for having the same obituaries?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Judge Issues $5 Million Award To Dow Jones In Hot News Case... But It's Meaningless
- Big Win For Fair Use (Even When For Profit), Big Loss For 'Hot News' & Fox
- Dow Jones Wins Default In Questionable 'Hot News' Case
- Dow Jones Files Idiotic 'Hot News' Lawsuit Against A Service That Sends News Alerts
- Healthcare, Journalism, And The Mad Dash For 'The Scoop'