by Mike Masnick
Thu, Mar 5th 2009 7:59pm
With France still trying to move forward with its plan to require ISPs to remove accused file sharers from the internet via a "three strikes" policy, French telcos and ISPs are protesting the plan, noting that it would cost them millions of dollars to obey the law, and they see no reason why the burden should be on them. This is an important point that often gets missed in the debates over such "three strikes" policies. The problem is that the entertainment industry refuses to adapt its business model to the changing market. There's ample evidence that if they did embrace new business models, they'd do quite well. So why should other companies pay for the entertainment industry's own laziness? And why are politicians (even those who seem to ignore copyright rules themselves) helping to push this through?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Ridiculous Ruling In Ireland Requires ISP To Kick Those Accused (Not Convicted) Of File Sharing Off The Internet
- Copyright Industry Keeps Asking For More In Australia: VPN Ban Next?
- Beyond Freedom Of Information Requests: Freedom Of Code Requests
- France Says Corporate Sovereignty Must Come Out Of CETA, Or Be Replaced By Something Completely Different
- Uber Having A Tough Week Overseas: France And South Korea Crack Down