by Mike Masnick
Mon, Mar 2nd 2009 1:08am
As it appears that the US government will be putting even more money into AIG beyond the $150 billion we've (us, taxpayers) have already spent, Fred Wilson has a good point about why government funded businesses will almost always act inefficiently. The very fact that every move they make is extra-scrutinized for how they're "spending our dollars" makes it almost impossible to act in ways that can help a company actually make the investments and decisions it needs to make. Instead, everything is second-guessed and scrutinized for "how will this look." This results in business decisions that are forced to respond to populist sentiment rather than good business judgment. This again raises questions of why we're propping up businesses that failed, rather than helping new entities open up.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Trump's Constant Whining About The NY Times Isn't Just Bad For The First Amendment
- Surprise: Now Even Australia's Biggest Business Organization Says It Has Doubts About TPP
- ACLU Dumps Docs On Social Media Monitoring Firm Geofeedia; Social Media Platforms Respond By Dumping Geofeedia
- Government Agencies Apparently Not Interested In Following Congressional Directives On Overclassification
- Vox: If The Clinton Email Scandal Has Taught Us Nothing Else, It's That Email Should Be Exempt From FOIA Requests