by Mike Masnick
Tue, Feb 24th 2009 11:18am
There was a flutter of controversy last week, when someone realized that a rather despicable video game, where the goal of gameplay is apparently to rape someone, was available for sale via Amazon's marketplace (where 3rd party sellers offer items, rather than Amazon itself). Amazon was quick to block the sale of the game, but that hasn't stopped a politician in NY from using the story as an opportunity to grandstand. New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn is demanding US publishers boycott distributing the game, which seems pretty silly since no US publishers are distributing the game (it's only been released in Japan), and there's no indication anyone wants to distribute the game in the US. But why should that stop a good opportunity to create some moral panic?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Senate Just Barely Rejects Plan To Expand FBI Surveillance Powers
- Both Trump And Clinton Suggest Expanding Mass Surveillance, Bogus Watch Lists After Attack In Orlando
- Latest Absurd Moral Panic: Parents Complain Amazon Echo Is Creating Rude Children
- Benchmark: Video Games Now Realistic Enough For Racing Games To Factor Into Racing Certs
- Apple, Arbiters Of Art, Say Game About Surviving The Gaza Strip Isn't A Game, Even Though It Is