by Mike Masnick
Mon, Feb 23rd 2009 1:52pm
While we keep hearing politicians and "child safety" activists complaining about violent video games and their supposed impact on kids, many people push back by noting that it should be up to parents to decide how to handle their kids' association with video games -- and some take the issue seriously. A bunch of folks have been submitting the BoingBoing story of a father whose son wanted to play the popular video game Call of Duty. After learning about the game, and recognizing some advantages to the game -- historical realism, the ability to learn teamwork, etc. -- he decided that he would let his son play, on one condition. While playing the game, his son and his "teammates" had to all obey the rules of the Geneva Convention. In other words, he turned it into an educational opportunity as well. The players now need to read up and understand the Geneva Convention rules -- and then engage by them, thus also avoiding some of the more gratuitous violence. So, there's a creative solution that some politicians and activists would like to have taken out of the hands of parents.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Bobby Jindal Announces Violent Games/Movies To Blame For All Those Mass Shootings
- Train Simulator 2016 And How We've Reached The Crest Of The Dumb DLC Wave
- DailyDirt: Can't We Just Play Games For Fun?
- DRM Still Breaking Games Nearly A Decade After Purchase
- Court Rules Gran Turismo Protected By 1st Amendment In Including Company Logos For Realism