by Mike Masnick
Tue, Feb 17th 2009 12:23pm
While it is rather amusing to see customers so interested in sticking with Windows XP rather than the supposedly more advanced Windows Vista that they're willing to pay a fee for the downgrade, it's tough to see much merit in the claim that such a charge is an antitrust violation. But, of course, that won't stop the lawyers from trying to convince a court that it most certainly is an abuse of a monopoly position. There's nothing monopolistic about charging more for a product that people want more. It certainly is ridiculous to claim that this is all a plan by Microsoft to squeeze extra money out of people by use of its monopoly position. Microsoft, by all accounts, would like nothing more than for folks to stop wanting to buy XP. The launch of Vista has been a massive disappointment for the company, not a part of a nefarious strategy to jack up the prices on XP.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Judge Nixes PS3 Linux Class Action Settlement As Class's Lawyers Victimize The Class A Second Time
- Court Says Microsoft Can Sue Government Over First Amendment-Violating Gag Orders
- Barrett Brown's Donors Sue DOJ/FBI For Monitoring Their Donations
- Pennsylvania Court Shrugs Off Microsoft Decision; Says Google Must Turn Over Emails Stored At Overseas Data Centers
- Judge Says Lawsuit Over PACER Fees Can Continue... As A Class Action