RSS
Italian Writer Claims She Owns The Rights To The Benjamin Button Story
from the someone-check-with-f.-scott-fitzgerald dept
Following the story of multiple authors all claiming credit for creating Hannah Montana, a few folks have sent in the news that an Italian writer claims that she actually wrote a story that was the basis for the hit movie, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button." The woman claims she wrote and copyrighted (but never published) a short story in 1994. That should strike quite a few people as odd, as most people know that the movie is very loosely based on F. Scott Fitzgerald's short story that goes by the same name as the movie... which was published in 1921. You would think that if the filmmakers really wanted to make a movie based on this unknown Italian office-worker's story, it would have been a hell of a lot cheaper than paying for the rights to the Fitzgerald story. Again, though, like the Hannah Montana case, the basic conceit of the story (someone aging backwards) is hardly that original, and is an idea that lots of people have had over time. It seems pretty silly to claim ownership of it.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
I smell a 2nd lawsuit...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Based on Merlin in Le Morte d'Arthur (1485). The estate of Sir Thomas Malory should take notice.
And of course, if anyone ever figures out where the Arthurian legends originate, someone else will be up to sue everyone else...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Orkan
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I own the copyright to the King Arthur story...
So give me my royalties!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh please
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh please
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
wrote and copyrighted?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wrote and copyrighted?
To be clear, she wrote and *registered* the copyright.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: wrote and copyrighted?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Public Domain
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Public Domain
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Public Domain
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Public Domain
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Public Domain
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Public Domain
The story *was* licensed, though I'm not sure why.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
You owe me...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Ha!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Something in the water ?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Derivative Transformative ?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Not again
I forget the name of the previous movie, but something like 10 people came forward to say they came up with the idea and should be paid, when the movie was written by a single screenwriter, based on his own book!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah. Original.
This is all bunk.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment