Illinois was one of the early ones in a long list of states that tried and failed to set up anti-video game laws. It was (I think) either the second or third such law to then be thrown out as unconstitutional. Since then, nine or ten more states have all tried and failed to implement similar laws. However, it looks like one legislator in Illinois hasn't been paying much attention. He's trying to add some more clauses to the law, more than three years after it was rejected as unconstitutional. Of course, if he was looking to amend it in a way that fixed the unconstitutional part, you might understand it. But, he's not. He's just adding more restrictions to a law that has been deemed unenforceable. Another great moment in politics.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- DailyDirt: Can't We Just Play Games For Fun?
- DRM Still Breaking Games Nearly A Decade After Purchase
- Court Rules Gran Turismo Protected By 1st Amendment In Including Company Logos For Realism
- The Full Counter-Argument To Game Studios Claiming A Need For DRM: The Witcher 3
- 200-Plus Scholars Speak Out Against American Psychological Association's Violence/Gaming Study