by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jan 12th 2009 5:54am
While there are still arguments over the legality of the government's warrantless wiretap program, apparently there's been a separate court case looking at whether or not a warrant is needed if the authorities are just listening to your touchtone dialing, rather than the contents of the call itself. The feds felt that if it was just the touchtone beeps, then they didn't need any warrant at all -- but a court has now shot that theory down. The feds tried to claim that such data was not "content" which would trigger the need for a warrant -- but considering that with today's touchtone IVR systems, such data could include passwords, PINs, social security numbers and other private data, it seems perfectly reasonable to suggest a warrant is necessary.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Senator Wyden Puts A Hold On Intelligence Authorization Bill To Block FBI Warrantless Surveillance
- Senate Just Barely Rejects Plan To Expand FBI Surveillance Powers
- DOJ Insists That Rule 41 Change Is Not Important, Nothing To See Here, Move On Annoying Privacy Activist People
- Court Tells Cops They Can't Seize Luggage And Send It Hundreds Of Miles Away In Hopes Of Generating Probable Cause
- Senator Jeff Sessions Looks To Blast A Giant Hole In The 4th Amendment For 'Emergency' Response