by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jan 12th 2009 5:54am
While there are still arguments over the legality of the government's warrantless wiretap program, apparently there's been a separate court case looking at whether or not a warrant is needed if the authorities are just listening to your touchtone dialing, rather than the contents of the call itself. The feds felt that if it was just the touchtone beeps, then they didn't need any warrant at all -- but a court has now shot that theory down. The feds tried to claim that such data was not "content" which would trigger the need for a warrant -- but considering that with today's touchtone IVR systems, such data could include passwords, PINs, social security numbers and other private data, it seems perfectly reasonable to suggest a warrant is necessary.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- New York Appeals Court Says Facebook Can't Challenge The 381 Broad Warrants Handed To It By New York Prosecutors
- State Appeals Court Says There's An Expectation Of Privacy In Vehicle Data Recorders
- Should You Have Any 4th Amendment Rights In An Airport?
- Federal Bill Introduced To Add A Warrant Requirement To Stingray Deployment
- Iowa Appeals Court Doubles Down On Curbing Police Abuse Of 'Inventory Search' Warrant Exceptions