by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jan 6th 2009 1:47am
One of the biggest problems with various "three strikes" or "graduated response" plans that involve ISPs slowing, degrading or removing internet connections from those accused of file sharing is the fact that they're based on accusations of file sharing, rather than actual proof and conviction. One of the most draconian of such plans has shown up in New Zealand, where the country's copyright minister yelled at those who pointed out how problematic the law was -- insisting that ISPs need to be responsible for stopping file sharing. Of course, many musicians recognize how problematic this is as well, and a bunch of them are getting together to protest the law in New Zealand, pointing out that "guilt upon accusation" is a horrible policy, and, even as musicians, they don't want such actions to be taken in their name.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Countries Sign The TPP... Whatever Happened To The 'Debate' We Were Promised Before Signing?
- NZ Newspaper: An 'Honor' To Welcome Small Pacific Rim Countries As They Sign Away Much Of Their Sovereignty
- New Zealand's Raid On Investigatory Journalist Was Illegal
- Judge's Opinion On Kim Dotcom Shows An Unfortunate Willingness To Ignore Context
- New Zealand Says Kim Dotcom Eligible For Extradition; Dotcom To Appeal