by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jan 6th 2009 1:47am
One of the biggest problems with various "three strikes" or "graduated response" plans that involve ISPs slowing, degrading or removing internet connections from those accused of file sharing is the fact that they're based on accusations of file sharing, rather than actual proof and conviction. One of the most draconian of such plans has shown up in New Zealand, where the country's copyright minister yelled at those who pointed out how problematic the law was -- insisting that ISPs need to be responsible for stopping file sharing. Of course, many musicians recognize how problematic this is as well, and a bunch of them are getting together to protest the law in New Zealand, pointing out that "guilt upon accusation" is a horrible policy, and, even as musicians, they don't want such actions to be taken in their name.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- TPP Also Locks In Broken Anti-Circumvention Rules That Destroy Your Freedoms
- New Zealand Confirms That TPP Would Extend Copyright Terms In Many Countries, Block US Plans To Reduce Terms
- Larry Lessig Tells New Zealand Court That DOJ's Case Against Kim Dotcom Is A Sham
- Can You Really Be A Copyright Expert If You Think Copyright Should Last Forever?
- Carl Malamud Asks YouTube To Institute Three Strikes Policy For Those Who Abuse Takedowns