by Mike Masnick
Tue, Dec 30th 2008 11:59am
Just after the UK's culture minister, Andy Burnham, announced that he thinks all websites can and should be rated, comes a story that highlights what a ridiculous suggestion it is to say that you can simply classify all websites. Facebook is facing a bit of a backlash after the company started banning some photos of women breast-feeding as being inappropriate. Basically, Facebook has been making its own judgment on which of those photos are "obscene" and which are fine -- and it's pissing off a bunch of moms whose photos have been deleted. And, of course, this is just one simple example. Thinking that there's some sort of single objective measure by which all sites (or content) can be rated is so wrong it's hard to believe that someone thinking such a thing was possible could hold down a serious job, let alone elected office.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- After Zero Rating Backlash, Facebook Returns With New, Somewhat Murky 'Express WiFi' Initiative
- Facebook, China, Fake News And The Slippery Slope Of Censorship
- Despite ESPN Whining, Nielsen Confirms Historic Subscriber Losses For Channel
- Comcast/NBC Tone Deafness, Not 'Millennials' To Blame For Olympics Ratings Drop
- Australia Ratings Board Bans Hotline Miami 2; Developers Tell Australians To 'Just Pirate It'