by Mike Masnick
Thu, Dec 11th 2008 10:35pm
Ira writes in to point us to a patent application on a sort of weapons device, where the title of the patent is listed solely as "Classified." It would be interesting if some patent attorneys in the crowd could weigh in on this. If the purpose of the patent system is to distribute knowledge, then you would think a classified patent doesn't make much sense -- but this is even odder, in that it's the title, not the patent itself (which is for some sort of weapon), that is "classified." It could be that the inventor himself (Peter Lockhart) set the title as "classified" but that doesn't make much sense either. Anyone know what's going on here?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Study: Mismarketing Of Patented Drugs Has Cost Society At Least $380 Billion
- Our New IP Czar Gives His First Speech... And It Is Not Encouraging At All
- New York Times Publishes Name Of CIA's Drone Strike 'Architect' While Other Media Outlets Pretend This Is Still Some Sort Of Secret
- How To Use 'Intellectual Property' Properly
- Patent Reform Bill A Good Step, But Still Falls Way Short Of Fixing A Broken System