by Mike Masnick
Fri, Dec 5th 2008 8:44am
Following the incredibly tragic story of Abraham Biggs' live broadcasting his suicide, plenty of "web 2.0" critics such as Andrew Keen jumped on the chance to blast the "anomie, cruelty and narcissism that characterises much of the web." Of course, if you think social networks are evil, you're going to interpret events that way, but, of course, as has been pointed out before, communication tools don't discriminate over who can use them -- so of course there are some awful people who use them, just as there are many good people. Communication tools don't change that. And, for every tragic Abraham Biggs story out there, it seems likely that there are many, many stories like Ayelet Waldman, who talks about how her online community of friends saved her from committing suicide. Of course, those stories don't get nearly as much attention, so folks like Keen can pretend they don't exist and that social networking communication tools are mainly used for shallow, meaningless conversations.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- What A Strong Modding Community Can Do: How Doom Has Been Yanked Into The Selfie Age
- Guardian, Salon Show How Keeping And Fixing News Comments Isn't Hard If You Give Half A Damn
- Bloomberg Latest To Kill Comments Because Really, Who Gives A Damn About Localized User Communities?
- The Many Confusions Of The Internet Is Not The Answer, By Andrew Keen
- Yet Another Website Kills Comments, Despite Study Showing You Can Have Civil Comments If You Give A Damn