by Mike Masnick
Wed, Oct 29th 2008 7:45pm
A few years back, we went from what had been a virtual office to actually having a real office. Yet, since the company had been virtual for a while, we've maintained something of a hybrid between a virtual office and a real office. Not everyone goes into the office all the time (some of our employees aren't local, though the majority of them are). Some rarely go into the real office at all. Still, there are days when we do try to make sure that everyone's at the office, and that can be quite useful. However, Wired is suggesting that more companies ditch their offices completely and move entirely to a virtual office arrangement. I can understand the appeal, but I think that a hybrid approach may work much better. There are times that having a real office space is quite useful, such as in allowing for more impromptu brainstorming and discussion. It also opens up the lines of communication much more. While our staff is good at using instant messaging, chat rooms and phone calls, there have been times when just sitting across from one another has helped get things done more quickly. Both the real office and the virtual office have pros and cons, but I'm not sure that it makes sense to go completely to one extreme or the other. Having a space that can function as an "open office" area, while allowing employees to telecommute most of the time seems to create a nice balance.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Techdirt Podcast Episode 30: Does Distance Matter In The Digital Age?
- Your Tax Dollars At ??: Government Agency Has No Idea How Many Of Its Employees Are Telecommuting
- To Succeed At EPA: Watch Tons Of Porn, (Don't) Work From Home, Or Pretend You're A Secret Agent
- Plenty Of Companies Would Consider Going Virtual To Save Money
- Telecommuters Cause Bad Morale? Perhaps That Is Indicative Of A Bigger Problem