by Mike Masnick
Tue, Oct 7th 2008 8:31pm
Last year, we wrote about an antitrust lawsuit filed against Apple for sending an update that disabled, or "bricked," the iPhones of people who had changed the firmware to accept outside programs. While Apple tried to push for a dismissal of the lawsuit, a judge has denied the motion to dismiss and will let the case carry on. While a full-on antitrust finding seems unlikely, there are elements of the case that may get Apple into trouble down the road -- and it all comes back to Apple's Achilles' heel: its desire to control absolutely everything, even after you've bought it. Depending on how this case works out, Apple may discover that it (legally) needs to learn to loosen the strings a bit.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Apple Updates iOS To Close Three Separate 0days That Were Being Exploited
- Why Apple Removing The Audio Jack From The iPhone Would Be A Very, Very, Very, Bad Move
- FTC Sues 1-800 Contacts For Restricting Competitors From Using Competitive Keyword Advertising
- Sen. McCain Unhappy Apple Turned Down His Invitation To Be Encryption Hearing Punching Bag
- Cy Vance Still Arguing For Mandated Encryption Backdoors; Believes Third Party Doctrine Supports His Theory