by Mike Masnick
Thu, Oct 2nd 2008 1:36pm
Why is it so often that we find those who strongly push for certain types of draconian laws are later found to be guilty of violating those laws? The latest is a mini-scandal in Canada, involving a plagiarized speech. Now, I've pointed out before that I'm actually all for plagiarizing politicians. However, as Rob Hyndman points out, it turns out that the guy who copied the speech, one Owen Lippert, wrote a book on intellectual property, where he pushed for much stronger intellectual property rules to be included in trade agreements. Of course, it's worth pointing out that plagiarism and copyright are related, but not the same -- but you would think that someone who believes so strongly in more stringent intellectual property laws would be a lot more careful about potentially doing anything that shows a disregard for intellectual property.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- City Of Mesa Abusing Trademark Law To Punish City Council Candidate They Don't Like
- John McCain, Forgetting His Own Support Of Fair Use On YouTube, Tries To Use Copyright To Take Down His Own Ad
- Dear Politicians: At Least Close Those Porn Tabs Before Sending Out Your Campaign Screenshots
- After Nine Years Of Censorship, Canada Finally Unmuzzles Its Scientists
- Minnesota's Broad Publicity Rights Law, The PRINCE Act, So Broad That It May Violate Itself