Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 30 Sep 2008 @ 9:20pm

  
  

  They probably added it because they use IE and didn't want people to see how poorly coded their 'this page is blocked' pages are.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Mr. Giggles, 30 Sep 2008 @ 9:42pm

  
  

  2009 IBC

  similarly, the construction industry is having hearings about classifying the new building code as porn...

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Chunky Vomit, 30 Sep 2008 @ 11:49pm

  
  

  Re: 2009 IBC

  Don't construction workers get enough porn when they go to the strippers at night?

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 1 Oct 2008 @ 1:49am

  
  

  Re: Re: 2009 IBC

  No, but the general public gets to see enough porn in the form of builders arse cleavage, nice...

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  zcat, 30 Sep 2008 @ 10:00pm

  
  

  Finnish police to blame

  Apparently the blocking list is one compiled and distributed by the Finnish Police.. so perhaps they don't deserve to be in the policing business?

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  qez, 30 Sep 2008 @ 10:03pm

  
  

  National Bureau of Investigation

  Any filtering system that classifies the W3C as porn doesn't deserve to be in the filtering business.
  
  I totally agree. The list of filtered web sites is provided by National Bureau of Investigation.
  
  The whole censorship is a like a bad joke. Here's one of the Electronic Frontier Finland's press releases about the issue. I don't know if you would laugh or cry if you would know all the details, this kind of stupidity shouldn't happen in modern day democratic society. I guess Finland is not part of that.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Evan Carslake, 1 Oct 2008 @ 2:45am

  
  

  Re: National Bureau of Investigation

  Haha that press release was quite funny, even the title alone.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Overcast, 30 Sep 2008 @ 10:25pm

  
  

  I get all my best Porn there.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Chunky Vomit, 30 Sep 2008 @ 10:45pm

  
  

  Can't a geek get off on reading HTML references any more? What is next, A List Apart? CSS Zen Garden?
  
  If this keeps up, I might have to go have sex with my wife.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 1 Oct 2008 @ 12:27am

  
  

  Finland is quite a bit more democratic than the US. That two party system seems to work so well. Which side of the sane coin is going to win this time? Why do USians think they own it? Oh yeah, its the US. Creators of the world.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Ima Fish, 1 Oct 2008 @ 4:01am

  
  

  My work uses SonicWall to block sites. Once Slate and the New York times were blocked as pornography.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Lisa Westveld (profile), 1 Oct 2008 @ 4:06am

  
  

  Actually...

  There are many porn sites that contain links to the W3C sites. This is a nice trick to tell webspiders and webcrawlers to get lost and stop spending bandwidth of the porn site itself. As a result, you can find plenty of references to the W3C on porn sites.
  
  Then again, many other sites including the TechDirt sites contain links to the W3C site. Techdirt uses this reference:
  
  So when an ISP blocks a porn site and everything it references to, W3C gets blocked too. :-)

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 1 Oct 2008 @ 4:54am

  
  

  One other option

  If you have an axe to grind with a web site you can hit the big filter companies and subit there URL as this or that.
  
  Once you have done this the site gets added to the bad list untill the site owner can try and get it fixed.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  NullOp, 1 Oct 2008 @ 5:41am

  
  

  W3C, porn?

  "When in doubt, filter it out." Thats how a lot of filters work. In todays litigious climate companies are trying to protect themselves from litigation in every way possible. An "All Ya Gotta Do" solution looks very attractive but, in fact, is not currently possible. So in the long run, deal with it.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Michael Tulloch, 1 Oct 2008 @ 8:03am

  
  

  Blocking sw

  When I taught introductory psychology at the University of South Dakota my students complained they couldn't access the class website from libraries or schools. I found out the state was blocking the Intro to Psych website because their blocking SW said the site contained "occult" material.

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Chris, 1 Oct 2008 @ 8:06am

  
  

  3 Women one Cup?

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Eric the Grey, 1 Oct 2008 @ 11:28am

  
  

  Filtering software

  I've seen problems like this, where sites were incorrectly labeled by filtering software. One of my radio stations (area93.com) is filtered at work as being a hacker site.
  
  Oh, and I find it interesting that www.w3c.org is owned by Yahoo. Talk about typo squatting.
  
  
  EtG

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  known coward, 1 Oct 2008 @ 12:25pm

  
  

  you mean

  the web consortium is not porn???

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  JoelMBenge (profile), 1 Oct 2008 @ 2:05pm

  
  

  It's obvious.

  Like you said, it's a "body". Need I mention that it strips code down to its bare essentials? *snerk*

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Jason, 2 Oct 2008 @ 12:19am

  
  

  Typed soft porn into google and this was one of the results, i thought it was pretty funny: http://leeannejaud.pictiger.com/albums/42405/16939866/

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Evan Carslake, 16 Oct 2008 @ 5:16am

  
  

  Re:

  There are more of her at http://www.27bslash6.com/photos_2008_beach.html

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment