by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jun 24th 2008 7:47am
Slashdot points us to the news that Atari has started suing various websites that posted reviews of new games prior to the release date of the games. The reviews are negative, but the real problem, according to Atari, is that there was a press embargo on reviewing the games, and if someone has a copy of the game prior to the embargo and hasn't agreed to the embargo, then it's clear that they pirated the game. At least one site has explained that it purchased the game legally from a retail source who mistakenly sold the game before the release date -- which would suggest the problem is with the retailer, not the reviewer. No matter what, the whole thing seems ridiculous. Suing those who review your games (even if the reviews are not good or if the reviews come out early) is a sure way to make sure many sites refuse to review anything you do again.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- PR-Stupid JetSmarter Will Charge Journalists $2000 If They Don't Write Positive Reviews
- Digital Homicide's $10 Million Lawsuit Against Game Critic Gone
- Google Report: 99.95 Percent Of DMCA Takedown Notices Are Bot-Generated Bullshit Buckshot
- Ex-Game Maker Atari To Argue To The US PTO That Only It Can Make 'Haunted House' Games
- DailyDirt: Old Video Games Live On...