LA Times Embarrasses Itself With Kozinski Coverage

from the digital-dumpster-diving dept

Last week we wrote about the hoopla surrounding some racy images and videos Judge Kozinski had accidentally made public on his personal web server. This week, it was announced that a panel of federal judges will be investigating Kozinski's conduct. I don't understand why an investigation is needed because it's pretty clear what happened, and that Kozinski did nothing wrong. My colleague Jim Harper links to a defense of Kozinski by Larry Lessig. I share Lessig's conclusion that the treatment of Kozinski has been disgraceful, but I don't think the analogy Lessig uses is especially apt. Lessig analogizes the situation to a man who climbs into Kozinski's den through a poorly-secured window and makes copies of the materials he finds within Kozinski's house. He also uses the term "hack" to describe the process of accessing Kozinski's files. I don't think this is quite right. It was a public web server; the files were readily available without a password to anyone who went looking for them. What was done to Kozinski was unsavory, but it wasn't illegal, and it's not analogous to breaking and entering.

A better analogy is dumpster diving. What happened was the digital equilvalent of somebody combing through Kozinski's trash and discovering an issue of Playboy. No respectable respectable newspaper would publish a front-page story about finding porn in a federal judge's trash. It's no more newsworthy that Kozinski inadvertently made some racy images available on his personal website. Kozinski's wife, Marcy Tiffany, wrote a letter about the affair that's well worth reading in full. She claims (and others agree) that the files were unearthed by an attorney with a grudge against Kozinski, who obtained the files months ago and has been shopping them around to different newspapers ever since. The LA Times apparently had this story months ago, but waited until Kozinski had finished the grueling work of impaneling a jury for a big obscenity case (it's hard to find a dozen people willing to watch hours of defecation and bestiality videos) before putting the story on its front page.

Even worse, the LA Times coverage appears designed to cast the material on Kozinski's computer in the worst possible light. For example, it describes one video as depicting "a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal." This description prompted a number of follow-up reports, including one in the San Francisco Chronicle, to describe the contents of the video as "bestiality," despite the fact that the video in question obviously doesn't depict bestiality. (The Chronicle story was here, but the word "bestiality" has since been deleted) The LA Times really ought to apologize to Judge Kozinski for needlessly dragging his reputation through the mud.

Filed Under: alex kozinski, coverage
Companies: la times


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Lloyd Shugart, 22 Jun 2008 @ 4:03pm

    Europe Gets It

    21. Piracy, and in particular the use of peerto- peer (P2P) for illegal fi le sharing, remains a burning issue in the digital arena because it simply siphons off part of the revenue that could be made online and thus creates disincentives to legal online business on both the supply and demand sides. Most stakeholders (content owners, distributors) consider the current legal arsenal not effi cient and deterrent enough. Besides, it has been extremely disparate across Europe.

    Now that legitimate content is fully available and awareness campaigns have been undertaken, content stake-holders believe resilient piracy should be tackled with greater energy, through increased liability of internet intermediaries and individual liability of illicit P2P users.

    Internet service providers now share this concern and are increasingly co-operating with content owners to fight online piracy. On the other hand some consumer associations, some consumer electronics players and some artists/ authors societies argue for moderation in prosecution of individual users, especially with regard to the use of P2P to share content or even for systems authorising P2P file sharing - P2P being not illegal in itself - through ‘blanket licence’ systems. Actions have recently been taken by the European Commission to reinforce and harmonise legal means to fight piracy.


    http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/studies/interactive_con tent_ec2006.pdf


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.