by Mike Masnick
Fri, Jun 6th 2008 12:41pm
It looks like Paul Krugman is the latest economist to join the growing group of folks who recognize the impact of infinite goods on business models -- and how it's not a bad thing, just an inevitable shift in the market. Unfortunately, his writeup on the issue is a little weak. He references Esther Dyson's predictions about this from fourteen years ago and the recent Rolling Stone article we discussed last month. What's disappointing is that, as an economist, he should have been able to look at the fundamental economics and understand why this makes sense, but he chooses not to do so. That leaves him open to criticism. The next stage of this debate is going to be showing, fundamentally, why this inevitable change isn't a bad thing. Some people already recognize this, but it clearly is going to require a lot more convincing evidence.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- World Is Catching On That Creativity And Creative Jobs Have Been Growing, Not Disappearing, Post-Napster
- Hollywood Keeps Breaking Box Office Records... While Still Insisting That The Internet Is Killing Movies
- Comcast Admits Broadband Usage Caps Are A Cash Grab, Not An Engineering Necessity
- Techdirt Podcast Episode 35: Kevin Smith On How To Be Yourself And Make A Living
- Techdirt Podcast Episode 33: Reddit And The Challenges Of Building A Business Out Of A Community