by Mike Masnick
Mon, May 12th 2008 1:39pm
The Universal Service Fund (USF) is a huge boondoggle for telcos, who keep getting more and more money out of it, with almost no oversight into what's done with that money. And, the way it's set up, it actually blocks more innovative (and cheaper!) services from being used to improve connectivity in rural areas. It's good to see others are beginning to notice this. News.com is running an article from Gregory L. Rosston at Stanford who points out that the USF rewards companies for being the least efficient providers. That is, by showing how much more it costs the telcos to provide for rural users, the FCC grants them even more money. In other words, the less efficient they are, the more money they get. Not exactly the type of incentives the FCC should be setting up -- but given FCC chair Kevin Martin's super chummy relationship with the telcos, perhaps it's no surprise.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Europe's Flimsy Net Neutrality Rules Go Live, Are Actually Worse Than No Rules At All
- Congress Has No Idea How The FCC's Cable Box Reform Plan Works, Conyers, Goodlatte Compare Effort To 'Popcorn Time'
- The Cable Industry Threatens To Sue If FCC Tries To Bring Competition To Cable Set Top Boxes
- Nervous About Regulatory Action, Comcast Bumps Usage Caps To One Terabyte Per Month
- Roku CEO Kisses Up To Comcast, Supports Opposition To Cable Set Top Box Competition