Mother And Daughter Still Blame MySpace For Not Protecting Her From Sexual Assault

from the go-after-the-money dept

Two and a half years ago, we wrote about a teenager who sued MySpace following a sexual assault, saying that it was the site's fault that she was assaulted. This despite the fact that she had signed up for the site, lied about her age and the actual assault (obviously) happened outside of MySpace. That's not to say that a crime didn't happen, but it's quite difficult to see how it could possibly be MySpace's fault. In fact, a judge made exactly that point in dismissing the lawsuit last year, noting that MySpace was protected under section 230 safe harbors, and even if it wasn't, it would "cripple" 3rd party communication systems if you could attach liability to them for every crime committed that touched on those services. The judge also pointed out that this seemed like a clear case of a parent trying to blame a big company for her own failings: "If anyone had a duty to protect Julie Doe, it was her parents, not MySpace."

Of course, that's not good enough for the girl and her mother, who have now appealed the case, still claiming that MySpace somehow is responsible. The girl's lawyers claim that MySpace still had a responsibility to protect the girl, even though he doesn't explain how it can protect a girl who lied about her age and then went off to meet with a much older guy in real life. It's difficult to see how that can possibly be MySpace's fault -- but the rule of thumb these days is always sue the big company that has the most money. As for the older guy accused of the sexual assault, he's been indicted, but last we heard, his lawyers were also thinking about blaming MySpace. After all, if the girl is blaming MySpace, then how could it be the guy's fault?

Filed Under: blame, safe harbors, sexual assault
Companies: myspace, news corp

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Annonymous Predator, 2 Apr 2008 @ 12:07am


    The government has NO CLUE - HOW to REGULATE ANYTHING related to - ONLINE!!! They are COMPLETELY - CLUELESS!!!

    Because parents are too STUPID to look after their OWN FUDGING KIDS... NEXT STOP - EVERYONE GETS A PROBE - COURTESY OF THE GOVERNMENT... In an attempt to "Protect some dumba$$' KID!"

    IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY - TO KEEP YOUR KID SAFE FOR YOU!!! During the Reagan years there use to be a commercial on WWOR TV channel 9 (New York City)... They showed a kid - with a baby... And the message... It's like being grounded for 18 years...


    MY SINCEREST WISH - IS THAT MySpace - and all other SOCIAL sites - ever blamed for - "Not keeping our kids safe"...

    1)Instead of banning "Registered Sex Offenders" Banned kids! A kid will ALWAYS be the VICTIM - it doesn't matter WHAT they did! Well... KICK THEIR LITTLE LYING BUTTS OFF THESE SITES!!!

    2) Turn around - and file civil and criminal suit against - parents who allow their kids online - UNSUPERVISED! It's called;
    a) Gross Negligence - YOUR KID - NOT MINE!
    b) Endangering the welfare of a child
    c) Corruption of a Minor
    d) Entrapment
    e) Being a pimp of an under aged kid!
    f) Prostitution of a child!

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown for basic formatting. (HTML is not supported.)
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.