by Mike Masnick
Thu, Mar 13th 2008 11:39am
Apple has been sued over and over again by companies claiming to hold patents on some of the most basic concepts found in Apple's iTunes and iPod offerings. However, given Apple's seeming willingness to pay up to settle such suits, it really shouldn't be a surprise that more companies are coming up with even more ridiculous patents to sue over. The latest is from a company named ZapMe which claims to hold a couple of patents that it says covers iTunes and the iPod. Of course the company is demanding an injunction and damages, though it seems unlikely that a court would ever grant an injunction. As for the patents themselves one was granted back in 2006 and the other came earlier this week. The newer patent is actually a "continuation" patent, a process that has been widely abused by some patent holders to adjust older patents to make sure they cover newer technologies. The Patent Office has been trying to put some limits on continuations, but a court recently wouldn't allow them to put the new rules in place. Take a read through the patent itself and explain, please, how this possibly served the purpose of furthering innovation?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Unpatentable Vegetables Are Now Patentable In Europe
- Subway, McDonald's And Burger King Sued Over GPS Tracking Patent... Or Something
- Competition In The Music Space Is Great: Fragmentation In The Music Space Is Dangerous
- Apple's Attempt At A TV Revolution Runs Face First Into Comcast Corporation
- Does Patent Licensing by Patent Trolls - Or Anyone - Serve A Useful Purpose?