Major Labels Under Antitrust Investigation

from the yet-again dept

Apparently the Justice Department is suddenly worried that the four major record labels are colluding in creating a new online music subscription service. The last time this happened was back when the record labels tried to (wait, this sounds familiar) create online music subscription services -- which were universally panned, rarely used and eventually shut down. So, even if the labels are colluding, given their strategic vision, it seems rather unlikely that they're going to leverage their position to dominate the market. They certainly could hold back other services -- but it seems like they've been doing that for years already, just with their own shortsightedness.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: antitrust, collusion, justice department, labels, riaa, subscription service
Companies: riaa


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Chronno S. Trigger, 7 Feb 2008 @ 1:39pm

    WTF?

    I may be reading the attached article wrong but I believe it's saying that the record industry is trying to offer a subscription bast system that will allow people to download all the music they want for $5. This 5$ can be subsidized by the ISP or the device manufacturer. Due to this idea they are now under an anti-trust investigation. Why? They want to offer a service that is what people want (No details on these restrictions) at a price they would pay or even not have to pay depending on how they get it. Why is this such a bad thing?

    "The subscription model is the only way to save the music business," Rubin has said. "If music is easily available at a price of five or six dollars a month, then nobody will steal it."

    Sounds like someone got the idea finally.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Feb 2008 @ 1:53pm

    Subscription services are doomed if they don't allow portability. People want content on players, PC's, phones, TV's etc. whenever they want as often as they want. Any subscription service that limits portability is dead at the gate.

    Their approach raises antitrust issues because the label's would control the entire supply chain. The Justice Department takes a dim view of vertical integration/dominance.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    TomTheToe, 7 Feb 2008 @ 1:58pm

    Re:WTF?

    "They want to offer a service that is what people want (No details on these restrictions) at a price they would pay or even not have to pay depending on how they get it. Why is this such a bad thing?" As was brought forth in the article the last time they did this, "The DoJ investigated a number of complaints, the strongest of which was that the major labels refused to license their catalogues to competing music service providers." A collusion of this magnitude by the record companies would put all other pay music services out of business. Only Apple and Sony would be big enough to afford to license any music from the big 4 music companies. The consumer would be left with no internet music download sources except what the label would allow. No thanks.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Chronno S. Trigger, 8 Feb 2008 @ 10:58am

      Re: Re:WTF?

      A valid point but technically they can already refuse to license to any one they want, they can force any price restriction they want, since they own the copyright to all the music.

      If I sell a product threw resellers and then all of a sudden I chose to sell it directly and not have resellers any more, is that monopolistic? Not if I still have competition. The RIAA still had the smaller labels and indie bands to contend with.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Eric the Grey, 7 Feb 2008 @ 2:42pm

    I doubt it's just the offering of the service

    Not that they are offering the service, but perhaps that they are using their leverage (ie: copyright) to prevent anybody else from entering the field with the same idea.

    The RIAA has certainly made it clear that nobody but them will be allowed to operate such a program and they are using DRM or Illegal Downloads, or whatever else they can to prevent it. They are THE reason the downloads haven't taken off with the exception of iTunes, and they keep trying to cripple that...


    EtG

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Feb 2008 @ 2:53pm

    Re: Post number 2

    i have an old version of the free version of TMPGEnc that will convert any video file to mpg (including wmv files with license restrictions) and any audio file to mp3.

    id love a service like that.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Feb 2008 @ 2:55pm

    Mike would some1 tell me why my posts keep getting blocked of?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Tommy, 7 Feb 2008 @ 6:03pm

    Wha?

    Doesn't anyone remember mp4? Oh yeah... exactly...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Overcast, 7 Feb 2008 @ 6:40pm

    So technically.. if so - than the RIAA is an accomplice?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    poster 5 and 6, 8 Feb 2008 @ 5:13am

    ty

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ken Hanscom, 9 Feb 2008 @ 9:26am

    Go away.

    The RIAA and the labels are killing themselves. They just need to go away.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.