by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jan 29th 2008 8:50pm
There's plenty of reasonable concern over the increasing use of surveillance cameras -- but if you're going to install them, you'd think that you'd want cameras that were actually useful. Not so in San Francisco. As Engadget points out, the cameras in San Francisco have ridiculously bad frame rates, making them more like still cameras than video cameras. In some cases, there are 10 seconds between frames, meaning that the "footage" is often not particularly useful in solving crimes. San Francisco still insists that the cameras are useful for deterrent purposes. Somehow we doubt that it's a "feature" of these cameras to protect privacy by being horrifically bad. It does make you wonder, though, who makes security cameras that only take a photo every 10 seconds -- and, even more importantly, why would anyone buy such a security camera?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Attorney Representing Whistleblowing Cops Claims Police Department Dropped Spyware On His Hard Drive
- Jeb Bush Compliments Obama For Continuing And Expanding His Brother's War On Terror
- Stingray Uber Alles! St. Louis Cops Drop Case Against Robbery Suspects Rather Than Discuss Use Of IMSI Catcher
- New Jersey Cop Demands Camera From Eyewitness After Police Dog Allowed To Maul Prone Suspect
- Hosting Companies Threaten To Leave France Over (Yet Another) Surveillance Law. But Where Could They Go?