Clean-Tech Bubble? How Cliche

from the here-we-go-again dept

There's no debate that the clean-tech sector has been enjoying a surge of interest from the venture capital community. Wired magazine takes a quick look at some recently released data that shows that clean-tech investments by VC have surged to new heights in 2007. The article notes that clean-tech dollars are closing in on the amount invested in Internet start-ups which, naturally, raises the specter of everyone's favorite B-word: Bubble. Yes, the accelerating rates of VC investment into clean-tech companies might chart something like late-90s VC Internet start-ups. Yes, 2008 may indeed bring some clean-tech "venture flameouts" reminiscent of Webvan and eToys. Overall, though, using the history of the Internet sector as a yardstick (let alone a forecasting tool) for clean-tech is naive. The article does steer away from this analogy to some extent: on the whole, clean-tech companies will be measured the old fashioned way, in revenue dollars rather than in clicks, page views, or eyeballs; clean-tech companies are generally trying to capture pieces of some very large existing pies, rather than define and create new markets for themselves; and clean-tech businesses look more bricks-and-mortar than Internet in terms of infrastructure requirements.

Digging a bit further into the numbers provides some insight into whether or not VC firms are looking at clean-tech as the Internet-boom redux. While clean-tech VC dollars are closing in on the amount invested in Internet start-ups, the number of companies funded with those dollars is much fewer (168 deals over three quarters of 2007 compared to 195 Internet deals in the third quarter of this year alone) and the value of those deals is substantially bigger (upwards of $11MM on average, compared to $5-6MM avg. for Internet companies). The number of new Internet companies getting funded far exceeds new clean-tech businesses, meaning much of the clean-tech money is re-investment in existing companies. In this light it's fair to say that the growth in VC dollars for clean-tech is more indicative of a maturing sector than of a bubble buildings to a burst. A few billion dollars seems to be a reasonable investment toward trillion dollar opportunities. But if I start seeing beige-and-white box vans driving around San Francisco again, and sock puppets on TV, I'll start getting worried.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • icon
    GeneralEmergency (profile), 11 Dec 2007 @ 2:08pm


    Note to Self:

    Pay more attention to market trends and sell off the stocks of tech companies that still use "IsDirty" bits or flags.


    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jon L, 11 Dec 2007 @ 7:47pm

    Hard Assets vs. No Assets

    One other element of note in the clean-tech funding strategies is that a great many of the investments are going into prototyping and *actual hardware* instead of lines of code that are supposed to turn into paying users or paying advertisers by magic.

    While some clean-tech startups are software-centric, that's not the case in the majority.

    So in the overall picture, I would expect *more* $$$ to flow into ventures that require real assets than I would expect to flow into two kids coding in their garage:)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    chris (profile), 12 Dec 2007 @ 9:45am

    it's not a bubble... i have proof

    i have a friend from seattle who jumped on every band wagon during the dot com bubble (we need to use java! XML is the greatest! why don't you have a blog?) and has turned into mr. web 2.0

    he's sort of like a canary for technology trends.

    he's not working for a green energy firm, so clearly there is no bubble.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    green economical nature, 14 Dec 2007 @ 4:18am

    Hydrogen Bubbles in the Sunshine

    The Internet bubble and the new energy technology sector could share the same irrrational exuberance, investment before profit and so on, but the industries are so different.

    Digital technology should be profitable from early on, when the overhead costs are low, you don't need a distribution infrastructure, and you aren't competing with viable established industries.

    Green renewable energy is something that requires a lot of steel and concrete to build, profits aren't expected up front, the physical infrastucture is where the tech gets a foothold.

    Still, IPOs are exciting.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Edustusto, 20 Jan 2008 @ 2:25am

    Green is Super-Demographic Trend

    Green is a super-demographic (covering all demographics: seniors, baby-boomers, young adults as well as youngsters) macrolevel and global trend - no bubble in sight in the near future as just starting to gain steam worldwide.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.