by Mike Masnick
Fri, Dec 7th 2007 2:24pm
Back during the big debate over the need for new laws against "camcording" a movie in Canada, Michael Geist pointed out that existing laws were already perfectly fine in dealing with the problem. Of course, despite all of that, the power of the movie industry lobbyists was too strong and the bill still became law. So, isn't interesting to find out (via Geist again) that a recent arrest for camcording in a movie theater didn't even happen under the new law, but under the old copyright law. So, once again, can someone explain why the MPAA needed that new law and why Canadian politicians agreed to it?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- USTR Releases Its Annual Special 301 'Naughty' List Of Countries; EFF Responds With 'Special 404' List
- Fair Use At Risk When Private Companies Get To Make The Decision For Us
- Music Licensing Groups Argue That An Homeowners Association Playing Music At The Pool Is A Public Performance
- A Gronking To Remember Is Immortalized In Lawsuit Against Apple/Amazon/Author
- Comic Artists Claim Copyright On Metallic Suits And The Three Point Landing