by Mike Masnick
Thu, Dec 6th 2007 11:21am
What do you do when the court orders you to do the impossible? The French High Court has apparently told Google that if someone alerts it to an unauthorized video being uploaded to Google video, not only does it need to take the video down, but it must prevent that same video from ever being uploaded again ever. It seems that some people still believe that this really is possible, but despite some companies claiming they offer filters that will block certain uploads, none have been shown to be all that effective. There's always some way to mask or change the content enough that these filters won't work. The question that comes up again, though, is why is this Google's responsibility? If there's liability, it should be on the person uploading the unauthorized content. If someone is clever enough to get around any filter, then why should Google have to pay for that?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- DailyDirt: Terminators From The Future Are Already Here..?
- MPAA Argues That Sony Emails Shouldn't Be Used As Evidence In Google Lawsuit
- German Court Says YouTube Isn't Liable For Infringement, But Wants A Notice-And-Staydown Process
- What's Behind The Attack On EU's Outdoor Photography? The Usual Copyright Maximalism And Anti-Americanism
- CETA Isn't Dead, But Its Corporate Sovereignty Chapter Is Still A Huge, Unresolved Problem