by Mike Masnick
Tue, Dec 4th 2007 3:37am
After being sued by the RIAA, file sharing app provider LimeWire fought back. Beyond claiming that it didn't violate copyright laws (by not "inducing" infringement), the company also countersued, claiming that the RIAA had violated antitrust laws in trying to illegally compete with LimeWire and other file sharing systems. This claim always seemed like a stretch, and apparently a judge agreed, dismissing the antitrust claims, noting that LimeWire failed to provide enough evidence to back up the claim. While it would have been nice to see the RIAA run into trouble on this point, it's true that LimeWire's evidence wasn't particularly strong, so this shouldn't come as a surprise or even be seen as much of a setback. It's just a case where LimeWire reached too far in its lawsuit and a judge quickly saw that.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Authors Guild Cements Reputation As Luddites: Hates The Internet And Especially Amazon
- Top RIAA Exec: There's No More Music In Africa And The Middle East Because They Need Stronger Copyright
- Court Realizes That Maybe It Can't Order Cloudflare To Proactively Block Any New Grooveshark From Ever Appearing
- Craziest Part Of Apple's Price Fixing Ruling: Publishers Knew They Were Encouraging Piracy, Didn't Care
- Torrent Madness: UK Cybercrime Official Argues That File Sharing Is A Gateway Drug To Crime