by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 27th 2007 10:18am
Earlier this year, a court agreed to examine whether or not the fines the RIAA is asking for in its lawsuits against people accused of file sharing is constitutional (that whole "cruel and unusual" bit). The RIAA, in response, has fought hard to keep from revealing any information about how much a download really costs, but a judge isn't having any of that and has ordered the RIAA in the UMG v. Lindor case to turn over the data.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- German Consumers Face $26,500 Fine If They Don't Destroy Poorly-Secured 'Smart' Doll
- India Learns The Hard Way That Equating Patents And Innovation Comes At A Price
- Supreme Court Won't Hear Case About Copyright Protection Of Pre-1972 Sound Recordings
- Why The DMCA's Notice & Takedown Already Has First Amendment Problems... And RIAA/MPAA Want To Make That Worse
- Patent Troll Sues Netflix, Soundcloud, Vimeo And More For Allowing Offline Viewing