by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 27th 2007 10:18am
Earlier this year, a court agreed to examine whether or not the fines the RIAA is asking for in its lawsuits against people accused of file sharing is constitutional (that whole "cruel and unusual" bit). The RIAA, in response, has fought hard to keep from revealing any information about how much a download really costs, but a judge isn't having any of that and has ordered the RIAA in the UMG v. Lindor case to turn over the data.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Netflix Keeps Losing Mainstream Movies, Informs Users They Should Be Ok With That Because Of Adam Sandler
- RIAA Asks BitTorrent Inc. To Block Infringing Content With A Hash Filter
- Spanish Cops Use New Law To Fine Facebook Commenter For Calling Them 'Slackers'
- Top RIAA Exec: There's No More Music In Africa And The Middle East Because They Need Stronger Copyright
- AT&T Fined Yet Again For Shady Behavior, This Time For Milking Low-Income Lifeline Program