by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 27th 2007 10:18am
Earlier this year, a court agreed to examine whether or not the fines the RIAA is asking for in its lawsuits against people accused of file sharing is constitutional (that whole "cruel and unusual" bit). The RIAA, in response, has fought hard to keep from revealing any information about how much a download really costs, but a judge isn't having any of that and has ordered the RIAA in the UMG v. Lindor case to turn over the data.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- RIAA Still Pushing Its Bogus Message Of A 'Value Gap' And 'Fair Compensation'
- Now Italy Wants To Make 'Fake News' Illegal
- Legacy Recording Industry To Trump: Please Tell Tech Companies To Nerd Harder To Censor The Internet
- AT&T Fined For Turning A Blind Eye As Drug Dealers Ripped Off Its Customers
- Homeland Security Admits It Seized A Hip Hop Blog For Five Years Despite No Evidence Of Infringement; RIAA Celebrates