by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 27th 2007 10:18am
Earlier this year, a court agreed to examine whether or not the fines the RIAA is asking for in its lawsuits against people accused of file sharing is constitutional (that whole "cruel and unusual" bit). The RIAA, in response, has fought hard to keep from revealing any information about how much a download really costs, but a judge isn't having any of that and has ordered the RIAA in the UMG v. Lindor case to turn over the data.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Total Wipes Decides The Word 'Download' Means Infringement, Issues DMCA Takedown Loaded With Non-Infringing URLs
- Free Our Paywalled Court Documents: The Aaron Swartz Memorial PACER Cup Contest Announced
- Mississippi Attorney General Dares Reporters To Find Any Evidence Of Hollywood Funding... So We Did
- Yet Another Study Proclaims U.S. Broadband Awesome If You Intentionally Ignore All The Warts
- Sirius XM Hit Again Over Pre-1972 Recordings