Should Facebook Users Worry About Ad Snooping?

from the probably-not dept

The New York Times's Bits blog points us to an interview with Esther Dyson in which she raises questions about the way social networking sites (especially Facebook) are planning use customers' data. She seems like she might be lumping together two different issues that ought to be kept separate. If she's simply saying that Facebook should get permission before sharing private user data with advertisers, it's hard to argue with that. But she seems to be making the broader claim that Facebook shouldn't even use private information to choose ads on its own site without getting the user's permission first. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. The information is already on Facebook's servers, so it's not likely to create new security risks to have the advertising algorithm take the information into account. Moreover, targeted ads can be chosen without ever giving advertisers access to anybody's private information. A shoe store might, for example, ask to have its advertising displayed to every Facebook user who's under 35, female, and within 50 miles of the 63105 area code. The shoe store would never get a list of Facebook users who met that criteria, nor would they be given the specific age or zip code of people who click on the ad. Rather, Facebook's own software would automatically display those ads and then bill the shoe store based on the number of impressions or clicks that were generated.

As far as I can see, there's absolutely no privacy issue there. Indeed, the debate gives me a sense of Deja Vu, because similar concerns were raised about contextual ads in GMail. As I pointed out at the time, having a server scan your email in order to choose ads to display isn't "snooping" in any meaningful sense. Once people realized that computer algorithms, not human beings, would be choosing who gets which ads, almost everyone agreed that it wasn't a privacy issue. The same argument applies to Facebook. Having an algorithm on Facebook's server use personal information to pick ads is completely different from giving advertisers access to users' private information.

Filed Under: advertising, behavioral targeting, esther dyson
Companies: facebook


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Thom, 6 Nov 2007 @ 12:43pm

    No?

    I don't know that I agree with you Jacob. What kind of ads do you see when you visit a tech site? An auto site? A fashion site? A food site? They're usually ads targetted to the content unless it's possible to target you more specifically. Even then good ads tend to slant toward the site content and not something out of left field. The content at Facebook IS the person's profile.

    Also, who says the only viewers of a heavy woman's profile are skinny men? Most of the repeat viewers will be her friends, family, classmates, and people who feel they have something in common with her. Maybe she likes and wears Lane Bryant. Maybe she looks good in it. Maybe her friends and family will follow the links to buy outfits for her. Maybe other heavy women will follow the links to buy their own outfits because she's so fine.

    Anyway, I think you seriously misinterpreted my post. I never said these are the ways they would or should target ads. I said consider these potential means of using members data to target ads and whether they have any privacy issues.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.