Suddenly Everyone Wants An Online Office Suite

from the how-to-compete? dept

Just a couple weeks ago, we noted that both Google and IBM were coming out with free products that competed with Microsoft's dominant office suite offering, noting that it was looking increasingly like Microsoft supposed monopolistic domination of the space might not be as strong as some (i.e., European regulators) believed. It certainly looks like more companies smell blood in the water. Adobe has now announced that it has purchased Virtual Ubiquity, makers of an online word processor called Buzzword, just to throw some more well-backed competition into the space. Of course, at some point, you have to wonder how this market shakes out. Obviously, Microsoft is still dominant, but can that continue when it charges so much against free products? The real question, though, may be what everyone else in the market can do to compete. We recently had the Techdirt Insight Community tackle exactly that issue for a client, and the experts there came up with a few key areas that online office suite providers should specialize in to differentiate themselves from both Microsoft and Google in the space. We can't share that specific analysis, but if you're in that space and want the Community to help you craft a strategy to stand out and succeed, contact us.

In the meantime, while I can't reveal what they said, I can give you my own quick analysis for free. It's going to be very difficult for most of these online office suites to get much traction if they don't have a larger platform to plug into. Players like Zoho and Thinkfree are basically trying to build that platform from scratch, but they'll probably need to open up more to third party developers if they want to really gain traction. Google can succeed in the space, in part just by being Google -- but also as it continues to integrate its office suite offerings into other parts of Google. If and when Google finally does realize that it's become a platform play, then perhaps they'll open up the ability to develop apps on top of Google's office apps as well. On Adobe's side, they're trying to build this platform, but it's unclear how much adoption it's really getting or how well they'll be able to integrate this new purchase into the platform play.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: office suites, online
Companies: adobe, google, microsoft


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    sam, 1 Oct 2007 @ 11:05am

    hi mike...

    as usual.. you put words where i didn't say them.

    no where in my reply did i say you advocate infringement. in fact, what i stated was that you continually say that the artist should bend/adapt/use the music as a promotional tool to generate revenue through other means.

    what i have continually stated, is that while there might be other avenues to generate revenue, and that using music/content as a loss leadeer might make sense, it's up to the artist (or whoever) as the owner of the content to be able to make that decision, and that no one has the right to simply "take" the artist's content because they choose to.

    you see, i believe that if a person creates the bits, the person gets to control what happens to the bits. if i don't like the price they're charging, i can simply choose to not play their game.

    if you and i can agree on this crucial point, then we might actually be close on this issue.

    as to the ownership of the bits you guys create, and the contraclual issues you mentioned, i'm 90% sure that if you walked into one of your clients, and told them that you wanted to do work for free, that you then wanted to give away, they'd jump for joy. (as long as it was properly redacted!!) i recognize that you give away plenty of what you describe as content for free. i also don't see you giving the jewels of what you do which generates revenue, away for free, or as a way to drive revenue for 'other' ventures, like oven mitts!!

    your ability to separate "custom" content and to claim that this is somehow scarce, is specious at best. the artist who makes his song can also claim that it's scarce, as he may only make a few 1000 of them in his lifetime. but that's not really the principle issue. the seminal issue comes down to what the owner can do, and ownership of the bits!


    peace...

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Advertisment

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.