by Mike Masnick
Fri, Sep 21st 2007 1:33am
There's absolutely nothing wrong with a connectivity provider limiting how people use their connectivity -- as long as it's clearly laid out in how they pitch the service. Unfortunately, too many of these services advertise "unlimited" service, but mean the exact opposite. In the US, Verizon Wireless used to do this. When confronted on it, they tried to doubletalk their way around the issue, claiming that it was "unlimited data for limited types of data" (read that phrase a few times). However, eventually, Verizon Wireless realized how ridiculous this was and started to back off the claims of unlimited data. Unfortunately, that sort of thinking hasn't reached the folks at Bell Canada, who are apparently advertising an unlimited service, while hiding an awful lot of "limits" within the terms of service. Again, there's nothing wrong with them deciding they need to limit the service -- but if they're going to do so, they shouldn't be advertising it as unlimited. It's amazing that no one's been charged with false advertising for these types of misleading ads.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- FTC Sues AT&T For Selling 'Unlimited' Data Plans That Were Actually Throttled
- Canadian Broadband Regulators Annoyed That People Are Pointing Out They Don't Understand What They're Regulating
- Why Aren't More Companies Sued For Bogus 'Unlimited' Service Claims?
- MTA Pretends 'Unlimited' Means 90
- Canadians Get To Pay More Money For The Same Broadband