by Mike Masnick
Tue, Sep 11th 2007 2:33am
For many years there's been a push to create free research journals in various academic and scientific fields. The reasoning was that the high expense of the traditional journals made new breakthroughs and research much more difficult and expensive, potentially slowing down important advances. There was also some concern about publicly funded research not being available to the public. For a while, the traditional publishers acted horrified at the idea of free journals, but it appears that they're finally realizing the idea might not be so bad. Publishing giant Reed Elsevier is launching a new free medical journal online for oncologists that it hopes to support with advertising. It hopes to sign up a bunch of doctors to use it and may launch other free journals in other medical areas. It's definitely an experiment -- and appears to be driven in part by the growing number of free sources online -- but it's still good to see the big publishing houses not just bashing the idea, but testing it out themselves.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Copyright Week: Open Access As The Antidote To Privatizing Knowledge And Learning
- Little Evidence Of 'Infringement Risk' For 'Copyright Intensive' Companies
- Should Doctors Who Put Their Names On Ghostwritten 'Journal' Articles For Big Pharma Be Sued For Fraud?
- Senate Exploring Med School Profs Putting Names On Ghostwritten Journal Articles In Favor Of Drugs
- Elsevier Reveals More Details About Its Fake Journal Division