LA Times: Publishers Think Google Is Worse Than Osama bin Laden

from the no,-really? dept

While the SF Chronicle may have gone through the stages of Google grief, it appears the LA Times is still very much in the denial stage. In fact, it's such extreme denial, that it's reaching near-satire levels. Robert Niles at OJR points us to an editorial in the LA Times saying that "many publishers" believe that Google and the internet are "a greater threat... than Osama bin Laden." Niles does a good job walking through how ridiculous that statement is, including pointing out that the LA Times refuses to name a single publisher who actually believes that. However, as has been pointed out many, many times, Google is not a threat to newspapers. It's only helping them. It's funny that, on the rest of the internet, tremendous money is spent on "search engine marketing" and "search engine optimization" to get better ranked in Google. Yet, when Google ranks newspapers well, suddenly, it's worse than terrorists. You would think that a newspaper with professional reporters would actually bother to get the facts and understand this -- but apparently that's too much to ask. The editorial goes on to complain about Google's new news commenting feature, because how dare Google actually provide people involved in a story a chance to tell their side? Apparently, all information needs to be guarded by some gatekeepers who don't even seem to understand how Google works. Of course, since the LA Times wants to keep those in the story quiet, you can't comment on the article. However, if I were Google, I'd add a response to this... on Google News, to demonstrate why that comment feature makes so much sense.

Filed Under: denial, newspapers
Companies: google, la times


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    |333173|3|_||3, 19 Aug 2007 @ 8:02am

    Re: Re:

    A random business which happens to compete ever so slightly for ad revenue and which could tell other people about my competitors is more of a threat to my business than someone who if I am very unlucky may blow up some of my reader, if I am extremely unlucky may blow up my office, and so unlucky it is not worth worrying about may blow me up.

    Theye are not even comparing like threats to their business, unless either Bin Laden is selling ads and showing news clips, or Google is threatening to blow them up. Possibly a better comparison to the stupidity of their statement is that London Irish rugby club is more of a threat to Arsenal FC than the Baltimore Orioles are, which is sort of true in the same way: the rugby club competes slightly for winter sports audience, ad revenue, and TV time, but the Orioles are in a different country in a different season and have nothing to do with the situation at hand, and are therefore less of a threat.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.