by Mike Masnick
Fri, Aug 10th 2007 2:58pm
Would you believe that the Patent Office granted a patent on the idea of embedding an LED light in a power adapter? It turns out that they did, and that's not good for Apple, who sells just such a device and is now facing patent infringement charges, in Texas, of course. While yet another patent infringement suit isn't all that interesting, what's amusing is the patent attorney's statements on the lawsuit. First, he insists the patent is valid, as if he weren't a biased source. He then suggests that we shouldn't question the validity of the patent because it's not a business model patent. While it's true that business model patents are questionable, that doesn't let other types of patents off the hook. Then, to get past the charges of being a patent troll, he insists that the holder of the patent used to have a company that made these types of chargers, though it's no longer in business and he can't remember the name of it. As for what are the next steps, the lawyer has it all worked out: "They [Apple] pay us millions of dollars, that's the next step." Apparently due process and all that sorta stuff really doesn't matter when it comes to a failed business man with a simple idea trying to squeeze millions from a company who actually has a product people want to buy.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Unpatentable Vegetables Are Now Patentable In Europe
- Subway, McDonald's And Burger King Sued Over GPS Tracking Patent... Or Something
- Competition In The Music Space Is Great: Fragmentation In The Music Space Is Dangerous
- Apple's Attempt At A TV Revolution Runs Face First Into Comcast Corporation
- Does Patent Licensing by Patent Trolls - Or Anyone - Serve A Useful Purpose?