by Mike Masnick
Tue, Aug 7th 2007 9:43am
Over and over and over and over and over and over again, state politicians have been passing laws that ban the sale of certain video games to children and every single time the laws are struck down as unconstitutional. Yet, local politicians keep proposing similar laws. Why? Because it gives them a talking point for the next election and making it look like they're "protecting the children" (even if the law does no such thing). However, what they're really doing is wasting taxpayer money, because every time one of these unconstitutional laws is passed, the state has to go to court to defend it, only to find it thrown out again. The latest state to waste taxpayer money over this? My home state of California, who has now had its law thrown out as unconstitutional, just like all the rest. Let's make this clear: more than ten states have passed these laws and not a single one has been found to be constitutional. Any politician passing such a law these days knows that they're wasting taxpayer money on a law that will undoubtedly be found unconstitutional -- and yet they do it anyway. What does that say about the politicians pushing such legislation?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Train Simulator 2016 And How We've Reached The Crest Of The Dumb DLC Wave
- DailyDirt: Can't We Just Play Games For Fun?
- DRM Still Breaking Games Nearly A Decade After Purchase
- Court Rules Gran Turismo Protected By 1st Amendment In Including Company Logos For Realism
- The Full Counter-Argument To Game Studios Claiming A Need For DRM: The Witcher 3