by Mike Masnick
Tue, Aug 7th 2007 11:13pm
By this point, everyone should know that broadband providers always provide "up to" speeds with the connections they sell. By "up to" they usually mean under perfect conditions that you will never, ever see. But just what kinds of speeds should you actually expect? A new study in the UK found that broadband speeds tend to be about a third of the "up to" speed. The worst speeds were about one-eighth of the promoted speed. As the article linked here notes, is it really any surprise that only 30% of people claim they're satisfied with their broadband? While it still seems like this should be false advertising, so far various regulatory bodies have said that the "up to" language is perfectly legal, no matter how misleading it may be. How hard would it be for an ISP to advertise expected speeds? I would imagine it would have happier, more loyal customers who know that the ISP is actually being honest, rather than hyping up speeds that will never be delivered.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- CenturyLink Follows Comcast's Lead, To Start Charging Broadband Overage Fees
- One Year Later, ISP Claims That Title II Would Demolish Broadband Investment Found To Be Total, Indisputable Bullshit
- Congressmen Upton, Walden Latest To Insist Nobody Needs Faster Broadband
- States Wake Up, Realize AT&T Lobbyists Have Been Writing Awful Protectionist State Broadband Laws
- The Cable Industry Is Absolutely Terrified Of Set Top Box Competition