Fri, Jul 13th 2007 5:15pm
The Washington state Supreme Court has ruled that a class-action lawsuit against mobile operator Cingular (now called AT&T) can proceed, despite a clause in the contracts it has subscribers sign preventing them from starting such actions. The suit in question alleges that Cingular overcharged some customers in the state for some roaming and long-distance calls, with a lawyer for the customers saying they were overcharged by $1 to $40 per month. Will this help the customers recover the charges and receive compensation in line with the overcharging? That seems unlikely, since all that's really happened is the court's given lawyers a green light to pursue a paycheck.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Dueling Lawsuits Threaten The NFL, DirecTV's Annoying Sunday Ticket Exclusive
- Warner Bros. And Rightscorp Argue That Copyright Trolling Is Protected By The First Amendment
- Class Action Lawsuit Over Apple DRM Stumbles Because Plaintiffs Aren't Actually In The Class
- General Mills Says If You 'Like' Cheerios On Facebook, You Can No Longer Sue
- After All That Fuss, AT&T No Longer Claiming It Has The Fewest Dropped Calls (Perhaps Because It Doesn't)