by Carlo Longino

On What Planet Is The 'News' That A Movie's Available On P2P Actually Considered News?

from the not-this-one dept

We've been noting with some surprise today the stories that seem to be popping up all over the place saying that Michael Moore's latest movie has made its way onto P2P networks. It's hard to see how this really constitutes news anymore, though perhaps we're wrong in assuming that pretty much any movie is available online these days. In any case, a story in Advertising Age seems to be where it all started, and it's notable -- if for no other reason than the ridiculous hyperbole contained within. The author seems genuinely surprised that he could find and download the movie easily, but the fun really starts when he says Moore and his distributor "have a [sic] every film maker's worst marketing nightmare on their hands -- how to persuade people to go to the theater to see a show that's available free on the Internet." Wow! Why would anybody go to the movies since it could be downloaded? It's not as if being available online and widely downloaded has kept other films from hitting the top of the box office, and obviously nobody went to see the latest Star Wars movie after it was leaked online -- it just managed to rake in $850 million by magic. It's probably also worth pointing out to the Ad Age reporter that Moore himself doesn't have a problem with people sharing his movies, since as far as he's concerned, "the more people who get to see them, the better."

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    GoblinJuice, 16 Jun 2007 @ 1:10pm


    Worst nightmare - Hardly. The anti-Bush, pro-Moore crowd will see the movie, no matter what. The pro-Bush, anti-Moore crowd won't. Availability online won't change this. It's free PR. It'll create more off a "buzz".

    Availability of movies online in general - Being able to watch a movie, in the privacy of my own home, allows me to decide if it's worth going to see in a theater (ie, enhanced movie experience) and/or purchase a copy.

    Cuba controversy - He broke the law. He knew he was breaking the law. Now, he's using his possible punishment as PR. It's one of his standard gimmicks - break the law, scream "persecution" when the law comes a-knockin' and generate more buzz for himself and/or his current product. The penalty will be nothing more than a slap on the wrist.

    Michael Moore isn't a journalist. He's, at best, an infotainer. An infotainer with a hard left bias. Bill O'Reilly, for example, is an infotainer with a hard "traditional" / conservative bias. Whether or not they realize it, they are both jokes to journalism.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.