Yet Another Misguided Idea For Saving Newspapers

from the here-we-go-again dept

There are no easy answers to the problems facing the newspaper industry, but before we can begin to talk about solutions, it's important to properly identify the problems. Oddly, a number of people seem to think that the problems facing the industry don't have to do with declining subscriber rolls and a failure to to adapt to the internet. Instead, they see a problem with the current ownership structure, whereby owners actually have to answer to shareholders and demonstrate growth. In light of News Corp.'s bid for Dow Jones, this concern has become more pronounced (particularly among journalism school types that are worried about the influence of Rupert Murdoch). One solution, proposed by journalism professor Chris Daly, is to get newspapers to pitch their readers on the company's stock (via Romenesko), sort of the way public television stations raise money through fundraising drives. The thinking is that if the readers were also the owners, their main priority would be good journalism. The most obvious problem here is that this idea doesn't strike at the root of the industry's real issues. There's no shortage of "good journalism" in the New York Times, but the company obviously needs more than that to reverse its fortunes. Another problem is that the two papers he's most concerned about, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, have ownership structures that are highly unfavorable to shareholders that aren't part of the founding family. So, unless that were changed, the new class of reader/owners wouldn't have much influence. Ultimate, any proposal that calls for newspapers to exist in some state where where profit isn't the primary focus is a white flag, an admission that the problems can't be fixed so they should just be swept under the rug. In the end, there's no getting past the economics. You can put newspapers in a charitable trust or under the ownership of some civic-minded individual who doesn't mind losing money, but if people keep canceling their subscriptions in droves, in the end it won't do much good.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Phil, 28 May 2007 @ 11:35am

    Newspapers by dave on May 27th, 2007 @ 7:47pm

    Here's a novel concept: Why don't newspapers stop being the propaganda machine for the George Bush administration? I think everyone is tired of hearing the same old garbage about how George Bush is deluding himself into thinking the Iraq war was a good idea and perverting Christian values as justification for it, then trying to delude the rest of us as well. It's no wonder that people are cancelling their newspaper subscriptions and going to online publications and video sites like YouTube; it's the only truly "free" media left in the US since George Bush started bribing the corporate pigs from the mainstream newspapers to report his message in exchange for large sums of money. If newspapers were actually criticizing the president for what he's doing rather than not only encouraging it but actively quashing all legitimate opposing views, maybe people would be more inclined to shell out dough for a subscription.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown for basic formatting. (HTML is not supported.)
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.