BT Says No Need For Traffic Shaping Or Breaking Net Neutrality; Just Add Bandwidth

from the well,-look-at-that... dept

It looks like the myth about how the internet is collapsing unless network neutrality can be broken is beginning to crumble. We've already seen that there's plenty of investment in increased capacity, and that those who actually understand what's going on say there's no real threat of running out of capacity any time soon. However, the real cracks start coming out when even the telcos aren't spewing what had been the industry line about the need to ditch network neutrality. Last year, Qwest's CTO admitted that most telcos who were complaining about file sharing traffic eating up their capacity were overstating their case and now the CTO of BT is saying that using traffic shaping to break network neutrality is completely unnecessary. He notes that they're investing in more bandwidth capacity, and that's all they need. In discussing Rogers ongoing traffic shaping, BT's CTO said that it sounds "quite Big Brother-ish," and he sees no reason to do any traffic shaping, since they'll have plenty of bandwidth to offer. It's the argument plenty of people have made for years. While QoS and bandwidth are two different things, if you offer enough bandwidth, the QoS issues tend to fade away -- and then the only reason to insist on QoS is if an ISP is trying to double charge some companies who have been better at monetizing the internet than the ISP. Of course, that hasn't stopped the press from droning on about how video is about to kill the internet. Apparently that makes for a much better story than actually talking to those who manage the network.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Oh yeh..., 15 Apr 2007 @ 10:23am


    Seriously BT is THE most deficient company out there. I swear. For years they wouldnt allow LLU for a number of made up reasons. They had to be forced in order to let LLU in.

    Ill tell you a little story. 5/6 months. Thats how long my BT exchange has been congested. My ISP complains to them, I ring up india and complain to them (for all the good that does me, mindlessly parry back what ive said then say I need to speak with my ISP). Written a letter to them. Im still running on a congested exchange.

    Oh if anyone high up in BT is reading this Exchange is Wisbech. Oh, and I hate you.

    Now, something else. So I decide to lower my contention and go with a 20-1 instead of a 50-1. Its a simple package change with my ISP but BT have to change stuff in the exchange. Fair enough. This is a simple operation that should lead to about 20 minutes of outage max. My Broadband was off for 10 days. Im not kidding you, 10 days. Now that might not seem like alot, but for a quick procedure this is appaling. From what we were told by the engineer who phoned us up to apologize (1471'd the exchanges number too, as you cant get that number) higher up in BT Wholesale they told them the wrong thing, they told them a few different wrong things consistently for 10 days.

    And these are the people you are praising? I wouldnt trust them to look after a tin of paint let alone my telecommunications. Unfortunately, out here in the sticks, we have no choice.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.