HideTechdirt is off for Thanksgiving! We'll be back with our regular posts on Monday.
HideTechdirt is off for Thanksgiving! We'll be back with our regular posts on Monday.

Private Business Getting Into Innovation Prizes

from the for-fun-and-profit dept

For some time, we've been noting the increased use of prize money as a way of spurring innovation, an idea made popularized by the X-Prize foundation's prize for private space travel. For the most part it's been government and non-profit foundations awarding the prizes, as they hope to spur advances that benefit some broader good. Now, however, the concept is being applied to the business world. Last year Netflix announced that it would award $1 million to anyone who could develop an improvement to the company's recommendation algorithm. Increasingl, venture capitalists are starting to wonder whether the model could be applied to their business, as well. It's not exactly clear how it would work. Some think that prizes could simply be a useful tool in building up a sector that the VCs could then invest in. Others envision models whereby a VC firm would take a stake in whichever company won the prize. Critics of the idea argue, however, that its the role of VCs to invest in companies that can make money, and that it's the market that ultimately rewards innovation. Offering prizes for innovation isn't really a market mechanism, and it could lead to "winners" that don't perform well as businesses. While it's likely that the prize model could not be transported perfectly to the for-profit realm, it does seem worth exploring further. Prizes like the one offered by Netflix show how they can be used to target something that could be turned directly into a business improvement. For VCs, perhaps a prize on how best to use prizes is in order.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    dorpus, 16 Feb 2007 @ 12:43pm

    How About a No-Suicide Tamiflu?

    Tamiflu has been implicated in several dozen suicides, when perfectly normal children suddenly decide to go flying like a birdie out of windows. Can someone devise a safer Tamiflu?

    In the latest fatality, a 14-y.o. girl decided to fly off a 10th floor balcony, and went to heaven.

    http://www.chunichi.co.jp/00/sya/20070217/mng_____sya_____005.shtml

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Feb 2007 @ 1:27pm

    another brilliantly on topic post by dorpus, wonderful

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      dorpus, 17 Feb 2007 @ 6:12pm

      Re:

      How DARE you accuse me of being on-topic! My entire existence is based on being completely ignorant, totally biased, and 100% off-topic.

      tamiflu was created by the CIA to subvert the government of (random country name here), not that it matters because people who live in (random country name here) are ignorant savages.

      Let's stay off topic, please. I like it when everyone pretends my stupid rants are worth replying to.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Sanguine Dream, 16 Feb 2007 @ 1:47pm

    I'll bet...

    that within 2 years someone will try to patent the business model of awarding prizes in this manner.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Joe Smith, 16 Feb 2007 @ 6:25pm

    Prior art

    "that within 2 years someone will try to patent the business model of awarding prizes in this manner."

    This business model is hundreds of years old but they will say that they are using computer to manage the contest and that will make it new and patentable.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.