USF: Still There, Still Looking Like A Big Waste

from the money-pit dept

The good old Universal Service Fund is back in the news again. Phone customers pay a fee into the USF with every bill, and state and federal governments then distribute that money as subsidies to phone companies, supposedly to defray the cost of providing service in hard-to-reach and rural areas. But it's been repeatedly illustrated that USF money is distributed in curious circumstances, and dubious quantities, doing little to dispel the idea that all it really does is provide another revenue stream for telcos. The AP has done some nosing around USF records and highlighted a few different angles. They lead with the idea that cellular subscribers pay an inordinate amount of fees, but they bury the real point: that there's little to no oversight of how USF money is spent once it's paid out to phone companies. For instance, in Texas, the formula used to calculate subsidies hasn't changed since 1997, and neither has the list of areas considered rural. Clearly technology has changed in the past ten years -- and it's absolutely certain that development has transformed many previously rural areas. In California, areas that are eligible for subsidies were determined in 1996, using 1990 census data -- and includes such downtrodden, out-of-the-way areas as Malibu, the Sacramento suburbs, and parts of the San Francisco Bay area. Phone companies say the USF delivers significant benefits, not just to rural customers, but even to those who pay into the fund, because it expands the number of people they can call on the phone. That's a pretty weak argument, and if it's one in which the phone companies absolutely believe in, they should have no problem with steps to increase the transparency and accountability of the USF, with a view to reducing the amount consumers have to pay in -- since, after all, they're just subsidies that should reflect the actual cost of providing service in areas that truly need it. But given the way they hoard USF payouts, and the shady actions of some telcos to replace USF fees they were no longer required to charge with made-up fees, we won't be holding our breath.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    john, 15 Jan 2007 @ 10:40am

    I'm shocked that telcos or the goverment would charge extra for services they provide. lol

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2007 @ 12:06pm

    I'm going back to smoke signals...let them try to tax me now!! *Puff* *Puff*

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2007 @ 12:48pm

    Re: Smoke

    Hope you're ready to pay the carbon emissions tax.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Not Dorpus!, 15 Jan 2007 @ 1:01pm

    Re: Smoke

    Not to mention you will likely get sued by a national organization for the advancement and/or protection of Native Americans, as I am certain that thye have, long ago, copywritten the method of sending communications via somke signals.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    misanthropic humanist, 15 Jan 2007 @ 2:18pm

    go for gold

    Why not nationalise the telephone service? You guys could get Bush together with Chavez, Bachelet and Morales and build a pan-American telecoms system second to none! I mean, you're almost there with AT&T.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    kl, 15 Apr 2008 @ 10:38am

    ticked off

    I SHOULD BECOME A SINGLE MOM AND SUPPORT MY 4 CHILDREN AND REAP THE BENEFITS like ALL THESE SPECIAL LOW-LIFER USER AMERICANS AND OR IMMIGRANTS AND THEN STILL LIVE WITH MY HUSBAND AND CLAIM I RENT AND HE DOESNT PAY CHILD SUPPORT BECAUSE i DO NOT KNOW WHO THE FATHER OF MY CHILDREN ARE. We could have a great life of fun vacations and free tuition ,lunches , clothes, sports programs, free health care, food programs, phone service, wow the possibilities are endless!!!!!I am so tired of supporting people who have no responsibility!!!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.