Another Muni WiFi Network Gets An Early Thumbs Down
from the good-idea-bad-execution dept
Earlier this month, the city of Corpus Christi, Texas launched its municipal WiFi network, which its vendor said
was the largest of its kind, covering more than 100 square miles. However, like some other muni WiFi projects, early reviews
don't sound too encouraging -- complaints echoed earlier this month
in Portland as well. It's the same sort of thing early users in
other cities have reported: weak signal strength, low speeds and difficulty connecting. Many of these problems occur when people try to use the services indoors (as one does), highlighting one of the drawbacks of using WiFi for this type of application: it doesn't penetrate buildings well, particularly when the router's at some distance away. Many of the network vendors say users need to buy repeaters to overcome this, something that takes away some of the "free" aspect of these networks, as well as something that takes away from their attraction to visitors. While we remain bullish on the
general idea of municipal broadband, it's still not clear at all that WiFi
is the best way to deliver it. Many of the muni WiFi "success stories"
raise as many questions as they answer, and the truth of how well these networks are working
remains pretty muddy. Again, municipal broadband is an idea with a lot of merit, but it looks like a lot of muni-WiFi rollouts are based on
the wrong reasons, and are possibly just using the wrong technology.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Been there, done that.
Spectrum is only half of it, geographic frequency reuse is the other part of the equation. The smaller your cells are, the more data you can move.
Add Your Comment