Wall Street Journal Editorial Apparently Clueless Over Copyright

from the let's-try-that-again,-shall-we dept

The Wall Street Journal has some really top notch reporters, but sometimes their editorials get a little out of whack. Tim Lee points out that a Wall Street Journal editorial about Google's relationship to copyright law cites his excellent paper on problems caused by the DMCA. However, they appear to have only looked for a quote they could take out of context and trash, rather than bothering to read the whole paper or, actually taking the time to understand the issues at hand. The entire editorial mixes and matches different situations to try to make their point (that Google is ripping everyone off and deserves to be punished), but if you look at each specific situation, none of them stand up to any scrutiny. Tim Lee points out a few problems with them oddly confusing notice and takedown safe harbor with the ruling that Google can use thumbnails of images -- two totally unrelated issues. The rest of the article trots out a bunch of weak arguments that we've discussed before, that can basically be summarized as jealousy that Google figured out how to make money by making others' content more valuable. They all jump to the conclusion that it's illegal to make any money by making it easy to find other's info, but if that were true, phone book companies, map makers and travel guides would all be equally guilty. The article brushes aside why things like the DMCA provide safe harbor, and why it makes a lot of sense to not blame service providers for the actions of their users. However, it seems that all the editorial writer can see is that Google is making money... and therefore deserves to be sued.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    thinlizzy151, 1 Dec 2006 @ 7:48pm

    WSJ Editorial

    IMO if this were some old-line near monopoly company that was making this kind of money doing the same thing then the Journal would have no problem. But seeing as how the guys running Google are not members of the Establishment old-boy network they must be doing something wrongl

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.