The Internet May Suck, But So Does This Article

from the professional-trolls dept

Almost a year to the day after Forbes came out with their hilarious blog bashing piece that made a lot more sense if you read it as satire (even if that wasn't intended), we have a similar case up in Canada, with a well-known (if neglected) news magazine declaring that the Internet sucks. It's kicked off quite a debate among some bloggers (and the journalist himself) -- but like the Forbes piece, this new one makes a lot more sense if you read it as satire. Think of it as an attempt to show just why the internet sucks as a medium for publishing news, by coming out with a piece that is so weak in its arguments, no one could possibly take it seriously. Of course, then you realize the piece isn't actually for the internet, but was originally published as the cover story in the magazine and you're left scratching your head again.

Basically, it's a professional trolling effort by a magazine that apparently has been losing its audience and has been unable to turn around its decline. You can go through the article, paragraph by paragraph, and point out the typical trolling techniques, from taking stories completely out of context to taking the words of a few and pretending that the entire world ascribed to that view to stretching the truth to misunderstanding economics and legal issues. What you end up with is a bunch of basically smoke and mirrors that can be summarized thusly: the internet sucks because (a) a couple people said it would do amazing things but (b) there's a lot of really crappy stuff and stuff I, personally, don't agree with (c) therefore what those people said is wrong. It's the equivalent of me saying: Henry Ford claimed automobiles would change the world, but with the growth of roads, we now have traffic pollution, accidents, and it's harder for me to ride my horse around. Therefore, Henry Ford is wrong and automobiles haven't done anything good at all. Man, automobiles suck. The logical fallacy is pretty astounding, and since even the support of that logical fallacy is built on such weak legs. With a good troll, usually the supporting material has a basis in reality, and then there's one small thing that's wrong. In this case, almost every paragraph has a glaring problem. In his defense, the author of the piece claims he wasn't trying to be "balanced" but thought-provoking. About the only thought he provoked was whether or not he actually believed anyone would buy his weak argument. In the end, he didn't do much of a job convincing me that the internet sucked, but that his article does, indeed, suck.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    cyberretroboy4444, 1 Nov 2006 @ 2:06pm

    Irony

    Ah, there is no better beacon of authority in the dark sea of the Internet anarchotechnocracy than ... "Mike"... And you can have your New York Times; I would much rather learn about the Middle East Crisis from "AvyTech" and "hans". Hopefully, we will soon live in a future free of capital letters and puctuation! Where anyone with a computer and an Internet connection can "create" their own Wiki-knowledge, without the tyranny of "qualifications" and "professional training."

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

Introducing the new Techdirt Insider Chat, now hosted on Discord. If you are an Insider with a membership that includes the chat feature and have not yet been invited to join us on Discord, please reach out here.

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.