How Much Does My Phone Say You Love Me?

from the when-gov't-eavesdropping-isn't-enough dept

An interesting new application in Korea takes up where governmental spy agencies leave off. You see, the pesky thing about government spying is that they won't let you use the tools or analyze their data. Well, all that is now behind us with the advent of KT Freetel's new "Love Detector" application for mobile phones on their network. The Love Detector uses advanced speech analysis techniques (actually used by Israeli security service, Mossad) to surmise the amount that the other party "loves you". There is also an application for determining if a party is lying or telling the truth. After a monitored call, an MMS message is sent describing the results of the analysis. The application lives in the network, not the phone, and is invoked by dialing a prefix (for the truth or lying bit, the prefix is James Bond's 007; for the "does s/he love me" trick, it's 42 -- perhaps a reference to the meaning of life, as per Douglas Adams) before the call you want to evaluate. The service costs either $1/use or $2.50/mo subscription. To be fair, it's being billed as "entertainment" and nothing more, and it may even be fun to try out - but there are obvious privacy implications that should be discussed. If you're not allowed to tape someone without their knowledge (in parts of the US at least), then are you allowed to use electronic analysis tools?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Xcetron, 21 Aug 2006 @ 11:13pm

    What if I scramble my voice and make it sounds like Darth Vader, could they still detect that?

    Anyone think they might start using that technology for the businesses and stuff, like check to see if youre lying or something.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Grimmace, 22 Aug 2006 @ 8:56am

    Large Scale Business

    I can see it now:

    Man on the phone: "My company wants to give your company a large sum of money"

    (After checking analysis)
    Other side of the line: "No you don't"

    Man on the phone: "Noooo how did you know?"

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Brad, 22 Aug 2006 @ 10:32am

    Don't be stupid

    The voice analysis isn't against the law because it isn't being stored. There's no law against letting a third party listen in on the call and give you their feedback - if there was then half of the middle school female population of the world would be in jail.

    Unless the system stores the voice, there's not even the remotest of privacy laws here. So an automated system analysed the pitch variance in your phone call - big effin' deal. Most of the time this kind of stuff get's way over-hyped, despite that it is grossly inaccurate and easily fooled. They sell desktop gadgets that do this, too.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5870654243&category=294

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Derek Kerton (profile), 22 Aug 2006 @ 5:20pm

    Distinctions

    Brad, I certainly introduced the subject of legal issues with my comparison to taping a call, but please note that what I actually wrote is that: "there are obvious privacy implications that should be discussed."

    Those implications are abundantly present, whether they are a legal issue or not.

    But you're probably right, anyway. The accuracy may be so bad that it is really irrelevant, and just an entertainment app.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.